This week we finished up our ROV and tested it in the pool. The ROV worked, but not quite as well as we had expected. It had a few problems with buoyancy once we put it in the pool. The write up on our ROV will be along shortly.
As far as feedback on the course, I can’t say enough good things. This class was excellent and was like no other class I have taken before. The freedom to experiment on your own, make mistakes, and problem solve made the class fun and educational. However, I do have some recommendations for future classes. I saw this past semester that many students including myself wanted to (or needed to) come in during hours other than class time. It would be good if students knew specific times when you or Jim would be around. It wasn’t really a problem for me, but I know other students wanted more time in the lab. I worked with Colin in the lab a few times, which I didn’t mind doing, but I won’t be there in future semesters. So you should be sure let students know when the lab is open or find another student you trust to open and close the lab.
I also think that using Arduino microcontrollers would add to the class. From what I have seen it is much better then the ones we used in class that were programmed in BASIC. It will also give students the choice to use the Lego brick or an Arduino to do data logging on their AUV/ROV. The Arduino could also be used in place of a Lego brick to control an AUV, if a student wished to take on that task. I also like the programming environment much better then the Lego software. The Lego software was useable but I found myself frustrated with it multiple times. I think that Arduino code is much more realistic as well. Learning how to write code using the Arduino (or BASIC for that matter) will prepare students to use other languages, whereas the Lego picture code does not. However, the Legos provide an excellent way to construct robots. So even though the programming environment is not great, it was still one of the most rewarding parts of the class.
As I mentioned before the format of the class was excellent. I can see a number of different courses taught in a similar format. I wish there were biology courses taught using this hands on format. It might be possible for someone to graduate from the marine biology program here at UMaine without ever handling marine life (hopefully not). My point is that the majority of our courses are lecture based. The marine science department is lucky enough to have relatively small class sizes. This is perfect for having more lab-based courses. If students were able to study live animals and perform dissections, no one would be falling asleep in class! I think this is definitely true of physics courses as well. However, the physics department does do a pretty good job of this. The labs reflect what is done in lecture and are usually engaging.
Lastly, I enjoyed the TED talks and definitely think you should keep them in the curriculum. It’s definitely a good way to inspire students and in many cases remind them to think out of the box.
Finally just as a side note, I will get the diver visibility data to WHOI at some point next week. There is one-year day of Tara data that I have found the TSG file for but its in four different files. I will try and process this data when I get time. I will also get the ROV write up to you as soon as I can. I have got a million different things going on, so I apologize that my progress has been slow lately.